Gryffin's Tail has moved!

Gryffin's Tail has a new home. It got too hard to mirror to this site. I don't maintain this site anymore.

Subscribe via email will subscribe you to the new site feed. Below is an RSS feed of the new site.

To all my email followers, I've transferred the Feedburner address to the new site so you should start receiving emails again. I didn't know this page stopped mirroring until a day or so ago. I'm sorry you've missed out for the last few months but the good news is that I don't post much so it'll be easy to catch up!

*

*

RSS feed of the new Gryffin's Tail site

*

*

Subscribe via email to the new site

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

*

*

Tweets!

*

*

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Silently winning in vaccine Court



I'm not sure who to credit this to, I think it's Sharyl Attkisson but I'm not positive.  It does link to the post on CBSNews, though.

It's a wonder to me how little attention those that win get, while all those that lose get paraded around on TV.  It's a wonder to me that a child that has as many problems as this, has to remove the autism connection in court to win.  It didn't change the boy's situation, he didn't miraculously not have autism - but that's how far this controversy runs.  Courts can't even think independently on it.  It's a wonder to me that no one will step up to the plate.  No one seems to care.  Instead, they call us crazy.  Never mind that my friend just told me that her infant son got another series of shots the other day and has been screaming in pain since.  Another child down.  I'm praying it'll all be over in a couple days and he'll make it out like so many other kids.  I'm hoping she's exaggerating her son's reaction.  I'm crossing my fingers for colic.

Forget about autism.  Forget about all the controversy.  Now think about all the kids and the vast range of disabilities that are stemming from vaccines.  Can you honestly say that it's safe for everyone?  Can you even attempt to ignore the list of side-effects in each package insert and say that even if it's not autism, those side-effects aren't real?  Can you really believe that vaccines shouldn't be studied more thoroughly?  What will you say when it's your child?  When it's too late?

I don't think anyone wants to end vaccines.  We just want some truth.  We want to know what's wrong and why they hurt some kids and not others.  Vaccines can't be improved upon and made safer if we don't know what's wrong with them.  We can't take steps toward preventing this from continuing if we don't even know where to start.  How many more children need to die?  How many more need to have developmental delays and neurological disorders?  What's the magic number?

I dunno.  Call me crazy.

January 19, 2011 12:22 PM

The Search for Safer Vaccines


The tragic death of little Elias Tembenis is yet another vaccine injury case you probably won't hear much about. Yet some medical experts believe it could teach us something about how to make vaccination safer.
It could also add to the limited body of knowledge as to why the vast majority of kids are vaccinated safely, but a minority become seriously ill, brain-damaged or even die. Still, government officials have said they have no plans to study cases like Elias': cases that victims are winning against the government in the little-known federal vaccine court.
According to court and medical records, Elias was born on Aug. 23, 2000 and appeared healthy until Dec. 26 when he received his second dose of DTaP vaccine. His parents noticed some swelling around the injection site. According to court records:
"Early in the morning on December 27, 2000, Elias's parents found himseizing in his crib and took him to the emergency room ("ER")...Within one day, he developed a fever, which led to a complex febrile seizure. Subsequently, Elias developed epilepsy. This fact pattern is commonly seen in the Vaccine Program."
According to court records, after the DTaP reaction, the once-healthy baby ended up with debilitating medical problems, including features of autism, ear infections and developmental delay. His parents first filed their case as one of the "omnibus" group of autism cases to be heard in federal vaccine court.
According to those familiar with the case, the couple felt their chances of winning with the autism cases was slim because the idea of a link between vaccines and autism is so controversial. So they separated their case from the autism group and filed on the basis of their son's epilepsy and seizures.
They recently prevailed in court. It's one more example where vaccine-injured children who end up with autism are quietly winning their cases, but only when they focus on the more general argument of seizures or brain damage rather than autism.
Some victory. On Nov. 17, 2007 Elias' illnesses became to much for him. The little seven year old boy died. If the right people bothered to study the medical details of the case, they might learn something about why Elias got so sick from his vaccines, and how to identify ahead of time what babies might have the same problem. The former head of the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Bernardine Healy, has said such study would actually protect the integrity of the vaccine program, rather than threaten it (as she says many government officials fear). So far, though, no takers. Elias' case becomes quietly filed away in vaccine court archives with nearly 1,300 other vaccine brain injuries-none of them apparently being pooled for study. An undetermined number of them, like Elias', involving autism diagnoses.
What made these children get sick? Why couldn't they tolerate their vaccines when most kids can? Unanswered questions.
Read both sides of Elias' case, including the government's argument against it.
Tags:
 
sharyl attkisson ,
 
Elias Tembenis ,
 
vaccine ,
 
vaccines
Topics:
 
News
 

Gryffin's Tail © 2010

Blogger Templates by Splashy Templates