Gryffin's Tail has moved!

Gryffin's Tail has a new home. It got too hard to mirror to this site. I don't maintain this site anymore.

Subscribe via email will subscribe you to the new site feed. Below is an RSS feed of the new site.

To all my email followers, I've transferred the Feedburner address to the new site so you should start receiving emails again. I didn't know this page stopped mirroring until a day or so ago. I'm sorry you've missed out for the last few months but the good news is that I don't post much so it'll be easy to catch up!



RSS feed of the new Gryffin's Tail site



Subscribe via email to the new site

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner






Monday, July 27, 2009

*/State identifies toxic chemicals/*

By Meg Haskell
BDN Staff

The Maine Department of Environmental Protection and the Maine Center
for Disease Control and Prevention on Friday released a list of about
1,700 “chemicals of high concern”— substances that pose a significant
risk to human health that also are used in manufacturing common consumer

The release of the list, mandated by a state law passed in 2008, was
hailed by state officials and environmental health advocates as an
important step toward protecting Maine’s natural environment, as well as
children and women of childbearing age, from the toxic effects of
chemicals. But a spokesman for the chemical industry expressed concern
that Maine may not have the resources to accurately identify or regulate
chemicals that pose the greatest risk.

“Increasing public awareness of toxic chemicals and their presence in
children’s products will promote the use of safer chemicals in Maine and
move us toward our long-term goal of protecting the public and the
environment,” said DEP Commissioner David Littell.

At 83 pages, the list includes many compounds whose names would be
unfamiliar to most people. But some, such as lead, mercury and
formaldehyde, are widely recognized for their toxic effects on babies
and young children.

Others, such as phthalates, bisphenol-A and deca, have become more
familiar in recent years as public health and environmental groups have
sounded the alarm about their presence in household goods.

Infant formula, plastic shower curtains, toys, cosmetics, furniture and
home electronics are among the products that can contain and emit the
toxic chemicals.

Littell said the list was distilled by DEP and Maine CDC staff from
existing rosters of toxic substances developed by the federal
Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, the World Health Organization and other groups.

Despite the length of the chemicals list, the law that created it calls
for action to be taken on a minimum of just two. The next step is for
agency staff to select two or more “priority chemicals” that could be
prohibited in products sold in Maine. Those chemicals can be banned only
if safer alternatives are available at a comparable cost. The priority
chemicals must be named by Jan. 1, 2011.

Littell said Maine and Washington are leaders among the 50 states in
regulating the presence of toxic chemicals in consumer goods.

“Far too often we are forced to confront the risks and benefits of
chemicals in products only after we discover they are present in
children’s bodies at levels of possible concern,” said Dr. Dora Anne
Mills, director of the Maine CDC. “We need to be assured that children’s
products are safe from toxic chemicals when they are put on the market.
The Maine [chemicals of high concern] list is an important first step
toward that critical goal.”

Also applauding the release of the list on Friday was House Speaker
Hannah Pingree, D-North Haven.

“Maine is being bold, and other states and the federal government are
watching what we are doing,” said Pingree. “This list may seem like a
small thing, but it is moving the national debate forward and the result
will be safer products for Mainers and, hopefully, all Americans.”

In 2007, Pingree was one of 13 Mainers from across the state who
submitted specimens of blood, urine and hair for testing at independent
laboratories. The samples were tested for the presence of 71 toxic
substances, including flame retardants, chemicals used in
water-repellent clothing, nonstick cookware, and plastics, and toxic
elements such as lead, arsenic and mercury. The testing found 46 of the
71 chemicals in the samples. Pingree had among the highest level of
phthalates, described in the test reports as “hormone-disrupting
chemicals that threaten normal development and reproductive health.”

The report of the testing was used to support the passage of the 2008
Kids Safe Products Act, which mandated the creation of the list released

Michael Belliveau of the Environmental Health Strategy Center, a
Maine-based nonprofit organization, said Friday’s listing should “send a
signal” to manufacturers.

“Hundreds of these chemicals, known to wreak havoc on our hormone
systems and cause cancer and learning disabilities, are in the products
used by Maine families every day and concern is building among the
public about the long-term effects on our health,” he said.

Roger Bernstein, vice president of state government affairs for the
American Chemistry Council, said Friday that the organization is not
opposed to states working to identify and regulate chemicals in consumer

But many states lack sufficient resources to develop a “science-based”
method for determining the actual risk posed by certain chemicals, he said.

“We don’t think the legislation in Maine was science-based enough,” he
said. “It was almost driven by a zero-risk principle.” Bernstein said
such an approach is “neither realistic nor informative” when determining
risk. The organization will work with Maine DEP staff to identify the
short list of high priority chemicals for further regulation, he said.

The American Chemistry Council opposed the passage of the Kids Safe
Products Act in Maine.

On the Web:

Gryffin's Tail © 2010

Blogger Templates by Splashy Templates